How to contribute to mxcubeweb#
Before submitting code to the repository, please read these contribution guidelines. The aim of these guidelines is to help the developer community to maintain the code stable and reusable.
Reporting bugs#
Before submitting a new bug report, check if the bug has already been reported in the issues. If it has not been reported yet, then:
Open a new issue with a short description in the title.
In the description, describe the bug:
Conditions when the bug appears.
How it can be reproduced.
Possible cause of the bug and source code where it occurs.
If possible, add an error log and a screenshot.
Assign a label to the issue (see available labels).
Submitting code to the repository#
Pull requests (PRs) are used to submit new code to the repository;
they help developers review and discuss the proposed changes.
To avoid any conflicts in the code base,
it is important to keep your local git repository synchronised
with the latest code in the upstream repository.
If the repository is checked out directly,
then use git pull --rebase
to obtain the latest code;
if a fork is used, then add the official mxcubeweb repository to the list of remotes.
If necessary, add a link to the official mxcubeweb repository:
git remote add upstream git@github.com:mxcube/mxcubeweb.git
A branching model based on the popular git-flow model is used in order to be able to provide versioned releases and, at the same time, continue separate development. The stable releases are kept on the master branch and, the development takes place on develop.
This means that all pull requests should be made against the develop branch. The work on the develop branch is performed by simply creating a branch for the work to be done and then making a PR according to the description below.
To fetch all branches and merge upstream to your forked develop branch:
git fetch --all git checkout develop git rebase upstream/develop
If you already are working on the develop branch and tracking the official repository, simply:
git pull --rebase develop
We recommend to always rebase your local changes instead of merging them, git can be configured to do this by default:
git config --global pull.rebase true
Preparing a new commit#
First, make sure that you are working with the latest changes from develop
git checkout develop`
git pull --rebase develop
Create a new branch. It is recommended to use a meaningful name, for instance
[initials]-[fix/feature]-[some name]
, i.e.mo-feature-gizmo1
git checkout -b mo-feature-gizmo1
If the pull request is associated with an issue, then reference the issue in the name. For example:
git checkout -b issue_100
Edit necessary files, delete existing or add a new file.
Add files to the staging area:
git add ChangedFile1 ChangedFile2
Save your new commit to the local repository:
git commit
Commit command will open a text editor:
In the first line, write a short commit summary (maximum 50 characters). It will appear as the title of the pull request.
Add an empty line.
Write a longer description.
Upload the content of the new branch to the remote repository:
git push origin NEW_BRACH_NAME
Go to the GitHub webpage and create a new PR.
Creating a new pull request via GitHub webpage#
Keep the pull requests small, preferably containing a single feature or change.
Give enough information about the changes in the pull request summary so that the reviewers easily understand what’s been done.
Highlight technically complex/complicated sections of the code and supply additional comments to code that might need extra explication/motivation by making inline comments.
If needed, assign a developer who should review the PR.
Accepting a pull request#
The author of a PR may request a PR review from a certain number of developers.
A reviewer can Comment, Approve or Request changes.
The changes made in the PR are assumed to be tested by the author
All the assigned reviewers of a PR have to review the PR before it can be merged.
A PR that has no reviewer assigned can be reviewed by anyone.
The author of the PR is free to merge the PR once it has been reviewed and all pending comments and discussions are solved.
Versioning#
Versioning is partly automated by GitHub actions and Poetry and is based on the git-flow branching model:
Each new feature is implemented in a
feature branch
, branching from thedevelop branch
.The minor version is bumped automatically by the CI workflow when a PR is merged on develop
The merge of a
feature branch
is made via PR to thedevelop branch
. The author of the PR must solve any conflicts with the latest development version before the merge.When decided, a release branch is created from the development branch and becomes a release candidate version.
Once the code can be released, the release branch is merged to the
master branch
and also to thedevelop branch
.If a bug is found in a released version, a
hotfix branch
is created with the necessary changes and applied to themain branch
and the corresponding commits are also cherry-picked to the development branch.
The exact routine is described more precisely in MEP01.
Coding convention and style guidelines#
Units#
Functions returning a value representing a physical quantity should in general be associated with a unit. It has been agreed that the following units should, where applicable, be used across the code base:
mm (millimetre) for translative motors and sizes
degrees for rotative motors
percent (%) for ratios like attenuation
keV for energy
K (Kelvin) for temperature
Å (Ångström) for resolution
Pixels are to be used for beam location (centre)
Date time
YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS(.ff)
, possibly with hundreds of seconds (ff), and with 24-hour clock.
Type hints#
We strongly encourage the usage of type hints
Naming convention#
Language and spelling#
UK English should be used for the spelling in documentation and code. Relevant examples for the mxcubeweb code base are for instance the words centring and characterisation that are the preferred spelling to centering and characterization.
Functions#
functions names should be recognisable as actions and should generally contain a verb
Variables and parameters:#
names of objects and values are singular
names of collections are plural or contain an internal ‘list’ (or ‘tuple’, ‘tpl’)
names of maps are plural or contain ‘map’, ‘dict’, ‘data’, or an internal ‘2’, like ‘name2state’
variables should distinguish between objects (e.g. ‘motor’) and their names or string representations (e.g. ‘motor_name’)
Booleans can be indicated by participles (e.g. ‘enabled’, ‘tunable’) or an ‘is_’ prefix. We should use positive rather than negative expressions (e.g. ‘enabled’ rather than ‘disabled’)
Properties v. functions#
You should prefer functions (‘get*’, ‘set*’, ‘update_’) when attributes are mutable and changing the value requires moving hardware or is slow or has side effects, or where you (might) need additional parameters like switches or timeout values.
For boolean states, prefer e.g.
set_enabled
(True
orFalse
) rather than separateenable()
anddisable()
functions.
You should prefer properties for simple properties or states of objects (e.g. ‘name’, ‘user_name’, ‘tolerance’). Contained HardwareObjects also use properties
Style guidelines#
It is very important to write a clean and readable code. Therefore, we follow the PEP8 guidelines. Minimal required guidelines are:
Maximum 88 characters per line.
Use 4 spaces (not a tab) per indentation level.
Do not use wild (star) imports.
Used naming styles:
lower_case_with_underscores (snake style) for variables, methods.
CapitalizedWords for class names.
UPPERCASE for constants.
When catching exceptions, mention specific exceptions whenever possible instead of using a bare except.
Add google style doc strings to describe methods and classes. Types should be omitted in doc strings if the method is type hinted.
An example of how to describe a class:
class ExampleClass(object):
"""The summary line for a class docstring should fit on one line.
If the class has public attributes, they may be documented here
in an ``Attributes`` section and follow the same formatting as a
function's ``Args`` section. Alternatively, attributes may be documented
inline with the attribute's declaration (see __init__ method below).
Properties created with the ``@property`` decorator should be documented
in the property's getter method.
Attributes:
attr1 (str): Description of `attr1`.
attr2 (:obj:`int`, optional): Description of `attr2`.
"""
def __init__(self, param1, param2, param3):
"""Example of docstring on the __init__ method.
The __init__ method may be documented in either the class level
docstring, or as a docstring on the __init__ method itself.
Either form is acceptable, but the two should not be mixed. Choose one
convention to document the __init__ method and be consistent with it.
Note:
Do not include the `self` parameter in the ``Args`` section.
Args:
param1 (str): Description of `param1`.
param2 (:obj:`int`, optional): Description of `param2`. Multiple
lines are supported.
param3 (list(str)): Description of `param3`.
"""
self.attr1 = param1
self.attr2 = param2
self.attr3 = param3 #: Doc comment *inline* with attribute
#: list(str): Doc comment *before* attribute, with type specified
self.attr4 = ['attr4']
self.attr5 = None
"""str: Docstring *after* attribute, with type specified."""
An example of how to describe a function:
def function_with_types_in_docstring(param1, param2):
"""Example function with types documented in the docstring.
`PEP 484`_ type annotations are supported. If attribute, parameter, and
return types are annotated according to `PEP 484`_, they do not need to be
included in the docstring:
Args:
param1 (int): The first parameter.
param2 (str): The second parameter.
Returns:
bool: The return value. True for success, False otherwise.
.. _PEP 484:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/
"""
You can use autopep8 and black to format your code:
autopep8 -a -r -j 0 -i --max-line-length 88 ./
black --safe ./
Continuous integration (CI)#
GitHub Actions workflows are used for continuous integration.
Additional notes#
Issue and Pull request Labels
bug
: bug in the code. The issue has the highest priority.abstract
: abstract class involved. The issue has a high priority.question
: general question.not used code
: suggestion to remove a code block or a file from the repository.wip
: work in progress.enhancement
: code improvement.
Milestones